Whether paid pre-foreclosure data makes a bird dog better or just slower

Question

Foreclosure filings were up 26 percent year over year in the first quarter per ATTOM, starts up 20, repossessions up 45. The list every scout works from is getting longer, and most have bought into some flavor of court record subscription to keep up. Here is the tension worth naming. Investors buying leads already pay for the same data most scouts are using. Handing over a pre-foreclosure address pulled off a list hands over a row the investor already has, and that pattern reliably produces nothing. The scouts who get paid consistently tend to bring things no query returns: a vacant house with a tarp on the roof and mail piling up on the porch, an owner who told a neighbor she is moving to be near her daughter, a tenant who mentions the landlord has not answered the phone since spring. The counterargument is that the data is what tells a scout where to drive. Nobody has time to canvass a whole county on foot, and a tax delinquency filter can narrow forty thousand parcels to three hundred worth walking. The list is not the lead, it is the map to the lead. But paying 80 to 200 dollars a month for a map that the investor's own subscription already outperforms cuts against the scout rather than for him. The sophisticated tools argument only works until the buyer has better tools than the seller of the lead. Worth hearing from anyone who has been paid recently for this kind of work: was the paid data actually doing the work, or was it a comfort purchase that made the effort feel more organized than it was.

diane_kowalski · Answer

On the land side I stopped paying for anything and it changed nothing about my output, though land moves slower and my sample is small. What I use is the county assessor site and the treasurer's delinquency list, both free where I am, and I confirm mailing address mismatches by hand. That combination surfaces owners who have moved away and stopped caring, which is the same signal the paid tools sell you at a markup. The tools save time. They don't see anything the record doesn't already show.

carlos_nunez · Answer

A scout paying for data can easily go fourteen months and earn exactly one fee from it, and that fee usually comes from sorting the list badly by the vendor's standards. Take probate filings. Every scout in the county is calling the newest ones. The filings eleven months old, the ones everyone has already given up on, are where an owner or two is finally ready to talk. So the data does work. The work it does is simply different from what the vendor advertises, and the freshness everyone competes on is the least valuable part of the file.

jordan_ellis2 · Answer

Six months in with nothing closed, so treat this as a report on failure. I bought a $99 a month subscription in month two and it made me feel productive while producing zero. What I did wrong was treat exported rows as leads and send them along in batches of twenty. The investor's response, roughly, was that he pays for information about the seller and not about the parcel. Nothing on my exports told him anything about a human being. That is a me problem more than a tool problem, but the tool made the me problem easier to hide.

Rena Expert · Answer

The distinction that decides this is whether the paid file gives you targeting or gives you the lead itself. Court-sourced pre-foreclosure and probate feeds, tax-delinquency rolls and skip tracing are all targeting. They narrow a county to a working list. Every active investor in your market can buy the same narrowing, so the row itself carries close to zero value in a negotiation over your fee.

What you add is the layer no query returns: property condition observed in person, occupancy, and whether the owner has said something that indicates motivation. That is the part investors are paying for, and it is also the part that keeps you inside the lead-finder role rather than drifting toward activity that resembles brokering. Licensing triggers for that line are set state by state and have been tightening in several, so confirm where your state draws it with a licensed professional before you start negotiating anything on a seller's behalf.

On the spend, $80 to $200 a month is worth it only if it changes how many doors you physically get to. If you're exporting rows and forwarding them, you are paying for a service the buyer already has. Test it directly. Take one month, work a narrow geography from free county records plus driving, and count how many leads produced a conversation with an owner. Compare that against the paid month on the same measure. Conversations with owners, not addresses delivered, is the number that tracks fees paid.

One assumption this rests on: that the investors you serve are data-equipped. Smaller operators who buy two houses a year often are not, and the row does have value to them.

luis_carrera · Answer

Following on from what @rena-expert said about smaller operators, that reframes the whole question. A scout who keeps pitching rows to the most sophisticated buyer in the market is pitching the one buyer who needs them least. The operator who does two flips a year and runs no software at all might pay for a list because the alternative is nothing. Optimizing for the hardest customer on the theory that they are the serious ones is the usual mistake here.

aliyah_b · Answer

My costed version of this. Free records plus gas puts me around $60 a month. Add the subscription and I'm at $200. If a fee runs $500 to $1,500 and I land three a year, the subscription eats a meaningful slice of a thin year, and it eats nothing at all of a good one. So the answer turns on whether you're already producing. Buying tools before you have produced anything is buying a map to a place you haven't proven you can drive to, @aaron_fitz10.

joe_delgado5 · Answer

Skip tracing is the one line I'd keep. Condition and vacancy I can see with my eyes, but a working phone number for an owner who moved three states away is not something driving gets me, and that single field is what turns an address into a conversation. The rest of the subscription I could drop tomorrow. Cheap per-lookup pricing beats a monthly seat if your volume is low.

omar_haddad · Answer

The thing I actually pay attention to in a scout's report is the roof, the ground line and whether water has been sitting anywhere. A tarp plus a stained soffit tells me more about the number than any filing status does. No list has ever told me that. @carlos_nunez's point about working aged files is the sharpest thing in this thread, because the newest filings are the ones already buried in mail from everybody else.

Whether paid pre-foreclosure data makes a bird dog better or just slower

8 replies