Finishing to the top of the comps versus stopping at rentable

Question

Two deals in progress, both roughly 1,300 square foot three-beds in the same submarket, and I've deliberately run them differently to see what the appraiser does with it.

House A got what I'd call rentable-plus. New paint, LVP throughout, a refaced kitchen with new counters, one bathroom redone, mechanicals sound. 51k all in on rehab.

House B got the full treatment. New cabinets, tile, both baths, light fixtures that look like the flip photos, 67k. Same crew, same month.

A appraised at 239k. B appraised at 251k. So 16k more spend bought 12k more appraised value, and at 75% loan-to-value that 12k returns 9k at the refinance. I paid 16 to get 9 back, and the extra six weeks B took cost me carry on top of that.

Against that, B rented in nine days at 145 more a month and the tenant signed a two-year lease. A took five weeks and I dropped rent 50 to fill it.

So the appraisal punished the heavier scope and the rent rewarded it, and I don't know which signal to build the next ten deals around. Appraisers in this market seem to work off condition brackets rather than counting my finish upgrades line by line, which caps what finish can do for the refinance.

omar_haddad · Accepted Answer

Your numbers match what I've seen and the mechanism is the condition bracket. Most residential appraisals rate condition on a scale, and moving from average to good moves the adjustment. Going from good to very good on cosmetic finish usually doesn't, because the comparable sales in the bracket already include a range of finish levels and the appraiser has no line item for your tile choice. You spent 16k moving within a bracket.

Where the money does show up in the appraisal is anything that changes the description of the property. Bedroom count, bathroom count, finished square footage, a garage, a permitted system replacement that resets effective age. I've had a 9k basement bathroom add more appraised value than a 22k kitchen on a comparable house.

On the rent side, I'd separate your two outcomes. The 145 premium and the nine-day lease-up are real, and over a two-year hold that's roughly 3,500 of the 16k back, plus you avoided five weeks vacant. But your A house rent drop of 50 might have been pricing rather than finish. I'd test A again at turnover before I credit finish with all of it.

What I'd actually build the program around is spending to the top of the bracket and no further, then putting the saved money into durability. Tenant-proof flooring, solid hardware, a water heater with life left. None of that appraises. All of it stops the 400 dollar calls that eat the rent premium you just paid for.

Finishing to the top of the comps versus stopping at rentable

1 reply