If the refinance only gives me half my money back, have I done BRRRR wrong?
Trying to get my head around the R that everyone talks about. Every write up I read describes buying at 70% of value minus rehab, then refinancing and getting all your cash back so you can buy the next one with the same money. The examples all end with the investor having zero dollars in the deal.
I ran a real listing near me as practice. Asking 165k, needs maybe 40k of work by my very amateur guess, and I think it's worth around 250k fixed with rent around 1,900. Even being generous, when I put 75% of 250k against what I'd have spent, I get maybe 55 to 60 percent of my cash back, and the payment at the rates I'm being quoted eats most of the cash flow.
So either I'm doing the math wrong, or the examples I'm reading are from a different time, or getting half back is normal and the guides just don't say so. What I actually want to know is what number a person doing this today would consider an acceptable amount of cash left in the deal, and how you decide that before you buy rather than after.