Get licensed myself or keep paying a specialist 2.5% a deal
Agent quoted me 2.5% buy side with a $6,000 minimum. I'm looking at four to six houses over the next 18 months, $150k to $220k, light value-add rentals I intend to hold. Call it $24k to $36k in buy-side fees across the run.
So I priced the other path. In my state it's a pre-license course, the exam, and then hanging the license with a broker, and my state also requires a licensee to disclose that status to the other side when they're a party to the deal, which is one of those things that reads differently state to state. Maybe two thousand up front, then dues and either a desk fee or a split on anything I collect.
The case for keeping her: she calls me on listings before they go live, she'll walk a property alone and send me a video with the mechanical stuff called out, and she writes offers at prices that make listing agents mad without needing a pep talk first. That is worth real money and I know it.
The case for licensing: on six deals I'm paying her the equivalent of a full down payment. If the seller side still offers a co-op fee I collect it myself, and since August 2024 sellers aren't publishing buyer-agent compensation through the MLS the same way, so in plenty of cases I'd be arguing for the equivalent as a price reduction instead. Whether that lands depends on the listing agent and how much competition there is for the house.
The part I can't price is my own time. Showings, lockboxes, deadlines, and a broker who wants files done properly.
Vote, and tell me what breaks the tie for you.
Four to six buys over 18 months at $150k to $220k. What do you do about buy-side representation?
30 votes