Getting licensed yourself or paying a buyer's specialist 2.5% a deal
Take a buyer paying 2.5% buy side with a $6,000 minimum, looking at four to six houses over the next 18 months at $150k to $220k, light value-add rentals intended as holds. That is $24k to $36k in buy-side fees across the run. The other path prices out roughly like this. A pre-license course, the exam, then hanging the license with a broker. Many states also require a licensee to disclose that status to the other side when they are a party to the deal, which is one of those rules that reads differently state to state. Call it two thousand up front, then dues and either a desk fee or a split on anything collected. The case for keeping a good specialist. She calls on listings before they go live and will walk a property alone and send a video with the mechanical items called out. She also writes offers at prices that make listing agents unhappy without needing a pep talk first. That is worth real money and it should be priced honestly. The case for licensing. Across six deals those fees are the equivalent of a full down payment. If the seller side still offers a co-op fee, the licensed buyer collects it. Since August 2024 sellers are not publishing buyer-agent compensation through the MLS the same way, so in plenty of cases the argument becomes a price reduction of the equivalent instead, and whether that lands depends on the listing agent and how much competition there is for the house. The part that never prices cleanly is the buyer's own time. Showings, lockboxes, deadlines, and a broker who wants files done properly. Vote, and say what breaks the tie for you.
Four to six buys over 18 months at $150k to $220k. What do you do about buy-side representation?
30 votes