One agent has off-market deals and weak numbers. The other has the opposite.
I've got money set aside for a first small multifamily and I've now interviewed two agents who both call themselves investor focused.
The first one brought me three properties that were never listed, one of them a tired 4 unit from an owner who's been renting to the same tenants for eleven years. When I asked her about rent upside she read me the current rents off the lease and said the area is strong. No expense detail, no idea what the taxes reassess to after a sale.
The second one sent me a spreadsheet on a listed 6 unit with line item expenses, a vacancy assumption, and a note that the seller's insurance number looked stale. Careful work. But everything he showed me was on the MLS and had been for weeks, and the numbers he was careful about were mediocre.
So the question is which of those two things I'm actually hiring for. I can learn to underwrite. I don't know how to make an owner who isn't selling pick up the phone. On the other hand, deal flow I can't evaluate isn't deal flow, it's just showings.
For a first purchase, which one would you go with?
For a first investment purchase, which do you hire the agent for?
10 votes