The rate card in their vendor agreement isn't the rate I quoted
First furnished unit, 2 bed near a research park, and I got as far as a vendor packet from a relocation management company. I'd quoted $2,550 all inclusive. Their standard rate card for my market and unit type shows $2,180, and there's a line saying vendor invoices at card rate less a 4 percent administration fee unless a market exception is approved in writing.
So $2,180 minus 4 percent is $2,092. That's $458 under my number, which is the entire margin over what I could get renting it furnished to individuals at around $2,050 with no packet, no insurance minimum, and no 45 day payment terms.
The rest of the agreement: 30 day cancellation by them at any point after arrival, unit must be re-cleaned at vendor cost if the assignee complains within 48 hours, $1M general liability with them named as additional insured, and a clause requiring me to provide a substitute unit of equal standard if mine becomes unavailable. I don't have a second unit.
What I'm weighing is whether signing at a loss on rate buys me something I can't get otherwise. Volume, presumably. But volume from a firm that can cancel on 30 days and pays in 45 isn't obviously worth $458 a month, and the substitute unit clause looks like something I'd breach the first time a pipe fails.
The exception process exists, so people clearly get above card. What gets an exception approved? Is it unit quality, or is it just that they had nothing else available that week?