Who holds title to the furniture when the money is somebody else's
I am looking at a small joint venture on four furnished units, roughly $38,000 of furniture and housewares across the four, against about $1.1 million of real property. The operator's draft has the furniture bought by a separate entity he controls, which then rents the packages to the property LLC for a fixed monthly amount per unit. His argument is that the furniture is portable, so it should not be entangled with a building it might leave.
My problem is that the rental fee he wrote comes to about $640 a unit a month, which pays back the whole $38,000 in fifteen months and then keeps running for as long as the deal exists. The capital is mine and the residual asset is his. He says that is fair because he sources, replaces and stores it, and he is the one on the hook when a tenant destroys a mattress.
The other structures I can see are the property LLC just buying the furniture outright and owning it, or renting packages from an actual third party furniture rental company at a market rate with an invoice I can verify.
The depreciation and cost recovery treatment differs by entity and that is a CPA question, so set that aside. I am asking about the economics and the control. Where does the furniture belong in a deal where the operator runs it and the passive money buys it, and what does the operator actually deserve to be paid for handling it?
In an operator plus passive capital furnished deal, who should own the furniture?
13 votes