Should a full gut have to pencil as a rental before you buy it?
A question about underwriting practice. A lot of heavy rehab models now carry a second tab, and it is worth asking whether that is standard or added work for nothing. Tab one is the flip. Purchase, rehab, carry, selling cost, out the door at ARV. Standard stuff, with the 70 rule as the sanity check. Tab two asks a different question. If the resale market goes quiet the month the work finishes, can the house be refinanced into a long term loan and rented at a payment the owner can actually cover? That requires an appraisal high enough to pull most of the cash back at the lender's loan to value, and a rent that clears the new payment plus taxes, insurance and a reserve. Confirm the refi terms with the lender before relying on them, because they change. The case for requiring tab two: a gut takes four to six months minimum, so the buyer is underwriting into a market nobody can see. Having a hold that works turns a bad resale market from a loss into a delay. The case against: insisting that every gut also works as a rental rejects a lot of deals. High ARV neighborhoods are exactly where guts create the most value and exactly where rent to price is worst. A 455 finished house renting for 2,800 does not cover much of anything, and requiring it to means only ever buying in cheaper areas where the rehab math is tighter anyway. So it is a real constraint with a real cost. Where do people actually draw it?
Does a full gut have to also work as a rental hold before you'll buy it?
22 votes