Choosing between a low bid, a mid bid, and a cost-plus bid on a gut rehab with aluminum wiring already found
Take a 1962 ranch, 2,100 square feet, purchased at 240 with hard money plus a rehab facility, previous owner had started a renovation in 2019 and stopped. With half the drywall already off, aluminum branch wiring turns up early, which changes the scope before work even starts. ARV in this scenario runs at 620, based on five closed sales in the subdivision between 598 and 641, all within the last seven months, all fully renovated. Three bids on the same scope: a low bidder at 185, fixed price, wanting 30 percent up front, with a track record on two houses for a known wholesaler; a mid bidder at 232, fixed price, 10 percent deposit, 14 week schedule with liquidated damages after week 18, licensed and insured with verifiable references; and a cost-plus bidder at 268 plus 18 percent, with an in-house electrician and self-managed permitting. Carry runs roughly 4,900 a month all in on debt, taxes, insurance, and a vacant policy that tends to cost more than expected. At 150 days that is 24,500. At the mid bid's number: 240 purchase plus 232 rehab plus 24.5 carry plus about 40 in selling costs comes to 536.5 against a 620 ARV, roughly 83.5 of margin, about 13.5 percent of ARV. The low bid produces a better number on paper, close to 89.5, but a bid built on a 25 minute walkthrough on a house that has already produced one surprise deserves real skepticism. The actual question worth answering is whether the cost-plus premium, roughly 36k over the mid bid, buys real protection against the next surprise a half-finished 1962 renovation is likely to produce, or whether it is simply the price of feeling managed.