Owner-managed subs on a 64k rental rehab versus paying 18 percent for a GC
Take a 1960s three bed in a working-class suburb bought with the plan of holding it long term. Inspection scope comes back around $64k in materials and trade labor: kitchen, both baths, all flooring, panel upgrade, some drainage work at the back corner. A recommended GC will run the whole thing at cost plus 18, call it $75.5k if the scope holds. Hiring the subs directly could plausibly land near the same $64k, saving $11.5k, since the same trades are usually available either way. Here's the tension worth naming. The reason many investors choose rentals rather than something more hands-on is not wanting a second job. Managing six trades across a 10 week rehab is effectively a second job, at least for those 10 weeks. But $11.5k on a house purchased for $148k is not a rounding error, it's close to a year of cash flow on a property like that. The real question is whether the GC actually saves the owner hours or just moves them. In practice, owners still end up on site two or three times a week either way, since a GC absorbs the phone calls and scheduling but not the decisions that need an owner's sign-off. Whether that's worth $11.5k depends on how much that owner's time is worth per hour and how many other projects are competing for it.