Salary as a flipper's project manager, or run my own crew at cost plus 18. Stuck between two offers
Two things landed on me in the same week and I have to answer both by the end of the month.
Offer one. A flipper doing about 20 houses a year wants me as an in-house project manager. $85k salary, health coverage, truck allowance $600 a month, and a bonus described verbally as "a piece of the spread" on projects that come in under budget. Nothing about the bonus in writing yet. I'd run all 20 jobs, hire and manage the subs, no tools in my hands.
Offer two. A different investor with a similar book wants a dedicated crew and offered a cost-plus arrangement, 18 percent on all job costs, and says he'd feed me 15 to 18 jobs a year. Average job cost on his last twelve was $46k. I'd carry three guys on payroll, a truck, general liability and workers comp, and my own admin.
Rough math on option two: 16 jobs at $46k of cost is $736k of volume, 18 percent is $132k of fee. Out of that comes my three guys if their wages sit outside the cost line, which is the part of the deal we haven't nailed down. If crew wages are billable job cost, the 18 percent is close to clean overhead and profit and it beats the salary. If I'm expected to carry the crew out of the fee, it's a worse job than the salary with all the risk.
That single question, whether direct labor is inside or outside the cost base, swings the outcome by six figures and neither of us has put it in writing.
Other things I don't have answers to. Both offers make me a single-client business. Option two has no floor if the investor's acquisitions dry up for a quarter. Option one has no ceiling and the bonus is a handshake.
What would you be asking before either of these gets signed?