2 points on a 6 month loan is worth more than the rate spread, so why does everyone quote rate first?
Numbers first, then tell me what's wrong with them.
Note A: 11 percent, 2 points, 6 month term. Note B: 12.5 percent, 1 point, 12 month term. Both $150k, interest only, paid monthly.
Note A: $8,250 of interest over six months plus $3,000 in points, so $11,250 on $150k in half a year. Annualize the points and I'm somewhere near 15 percent on the money while it's out.
Note B: $18,750 of interest plus $1,500 of points, so $20,250 over a full year, about 13.5 percent.
So A looks better and it isn't close. Except A gives me back $150k in month six and I have no idea what I'm doing with it. If it sits for three months waiting on the next deal, my twelve month return on that capital drops to roughly 11.3 percent and B wins. If I can redeploy in two weeks, A wins by a mile.
The rate is the number everyone in the room quotes and it's the number that matters least in this comparison. What I can't tell is whether pipeline is a thing you can actually count on or whether assuming instant redeployment is the same kind of optimism as assuming a flip sells in 90 days.
How do you rank two notes?
How do you rank two note opportunities against each other?
28 votes