Two points on a six month note can be worth more than the rate spread, so why is rate the number everyone quotes first?
Numbers first, then tell me what is wrong with them. Note A: 11 percent, 2 points, 6 month term. Note B: 12.5 percent, 1 point, 12 month term. Both $150k, interest only, paid monthly. Note A produces $8,250 of interest over six months plus $3,000 in points, so $11,250 on $150k in half a year. Annualize the points and the lender is somewhere near 15 percent on the money while it is out. Note B produces $18,750 of interest plus $1,500 of points, so $20,250 over a full year, about 13.5 percent. So A looks better and it is not close. Except A hands the $150k back in month six, and the lender needs somewhere to put it. If it sits for three months waiting on the next deal, the twelve month return on that capital drops to roughly 11.3 percent and B wins. If it can be redeployed in two weeks, A wins by a mile. The rate is the number everyone in the room quotes and it is the number that matters least in this comparison. The open question is whether pipeline is something a lender can actually count on, or whether assuming instant redeployment is the same kind of optimism as assuming a flip sells in 90 days. How do you rank two notes?
How do you rank two note opportunities against each other?
28 votes