DSCR got you the building, now the owner-occupant rules are gone and everything changes
A DSCR loan closes on rental income alone, no personal income verification, which is why it works so well for investors who can not show a clean W-2. The tradeoff is that DSCR is a non-owner-occupied product, so you are stepping into the building as a landlord from day one, not as an owner-occupant who happens to have tenants. That distinction rewires almost every assumption that house hacking content is built on. The owner-occupant financing advantages, the low down payment, the looser reserve requirements, the ability to count projected rent to qualify, none of that applied to your purchase, and understanding what you actually have now matters more than anything else in this first year. A typical DSCR deal comes in at 20 to 25 percent down, so your equity position is real but your cash margin is thinner than a 5 percent conventional buyer who ran the same numbers. The assumption doing the most work in most post-DSCR house hack plans is that the owner's unit is free. It is not free, it has a cost, and that cost is the rent you are forgoing by occupying it yourself. Say the building is a fourplex and each unit would lease at $1,400. Your occupied unit is a $1,400 monthly decision, not a perk, and the DSCR the lender underwrote assumed you were renting it out. If your debt service is $3,800 and the three rented units bring $4,200, you are clearing $400 before maintenance, vacancy and capex, which is a thinner cushion than it looks on a spreadsheet when a water heater goes. The piece people miss at this stage is that your lease agreements now govern everything, because you have no owner-occupant buffer if a tenant disputes something. Get a property management attorney to review your leases before you put anyone in, not after the first problem surfaces. What is the unit mix, and what did the DSCR lender underwrite as the market rent on the unit you are living in?