Lift station or 40 fewer lots: my engineer priced both and I like neither
Mid-project decision I have to make in about three weeks.
112 acres, rezoned last year, preliminary plat approved for 296 lots at an average of 62 foot fronts. The site drains two ways. About 70 percent falls toward the existing gravity sewer at the south boundary. The remaining 30 percent, call it 96 lots, sits on the other side of a ridge and can't reach that main by gravity.
Option A: build a lift station and force main to serve the 96. Engineer's opinion of probable cost is $1.35 million all in, plus the city requires a maintenance escrow and wants a redundancy standard I hadn't budgeted. Call it $1.5 million, or about $15,600 per lot for those 96 lots on top of my base improvement cost of $41,000 a lot. Those lots go to about $56,600 all in against a finished lot price of $78,000 to $82,000 in this submarket.
Option B: drop the north side to large lots on septic. Perc results came back marginal in two of five test pits. Best case I get 26 lots at roughly 1.5 acres, at a lot price my two builders don't want because they don't build that product. I'd be selling those to individual buyers over years, which is a different business with a different sales cost.
Option C, which my engineer floated and I don't understand well enough: pump to a neighboring development's existing lift station under a capacity share agreement. Their station reportedly has headroom. That's a private negotiation plus city approval plus a cost share nobody has scoped.
My loan is drawn 40 percent, I'm 14 months into a projected 30 month build out, and my first phase of 88 lots is closing to a builder next month at $79,500, which funds the next phase. Phase 2 engineering has to be final in three weeks or I lose the paving crew's window and slip into next spring.
Option A pencils thin. Option B changes my whole business. Option C is a maybe with no numbers. What am I not seeing?