Carrying seller paper on a listing-marketing shop with 38 retainers and 4.5% monthly churn on 60 month terms
Take a broker-services shop in a metro of about 900k where the owner wants the buyer's lender, or the seller, to carry most of the paper. Reading notes like this for a year turns up plenty of collateral tied to hard assets and very few tied mainly to a client list, so this one is worth walking through carefully. The unaudited numbers, three years of P&Ls plus a client spreadsheet: 38 agent clients on monthly retainers, average $480 a month, so $18,240 MRR. Retainer covers listing presentation builds, a property marketing package per listing, email sends and social scheduling. On top of that, roughly $95k a year in one-off project work, mostly brand refreshes and single-property sites for teams. Call it $314k of revenue, an owner draw of $118k, and two part-time contractors on 1099. Ask is $310k. Say the buyer puts in $124k cash and the seller carries $186k at 8% over 60 months, monthly payment right around $3,770, with a personal guarantee and a security interest in whatever the business assets actually are. The number that should bother anyone looking at this is churn. A client sheet showing 4.5% monthly works out to something like 42% of the roster gone per year and an average client life around 22 months. A 60 month note outlives the customers by a wide margin unless the buyer replaces them at the same rate the seller did, and acquisition cost data is usually the missing piece. A common seller pitch is that post-settlement the agents who survive spend more on marketing, so retainers go up. Maybe. The counter is that those same agents can now get a passable listing flyer out of a chat window for nothing. The real decision is whether to carry the paper at all, and if so, whether to cut the term to 36 months and take the higher payment, or hold 60 and demand something real as security. On a business whose assets are a software subscription and a client relationship, real security is the harder question to answer than the rate.