Designer of record or flipper-led with an hourly consultant on a 3M renovation
I sat in on a walkthrough of a 3.1M gut where the designer was on a percentage of construction cost and had sign-off authority over the GC's submittals. Two days later I read a scope sheet from an operator who does his own selections and pays a designer 185 an hour for slabs and tile only. Each of them told me the other one is burning money.
Case for a designer of record: high-end buyers notice when a house is coherent, and someone with authority keeps the millwork and the lighting from being two unrelated ideas. You also get one person accountable when a change order shows up, which matters when the finish schedule is 40 pages.
Case against: a fee on a percentage of construction cost rewards a bigger construction cost. The flipper who owns the decisions can cut a 42k lighting package to 19k in an afternoon without negotiating with anyone. And at luxury the design fee itself is real money, 2 to 3 percent of a 3M build is not a rounding error.
Which failure is worse in this segment, paying 90k more in fees for a house that hangs together, or saving it and listing something that reads as a contractor's idea of luxury?
How would you set up design authority on a 3M+ flip?
13 votes