Earnest money or funding at the closing table: which side of a luxury assignment would you rather put money into?
Two operators have approached me in the last month and they want opposite things.
The first wants deposit money. He's got sellers who won't take a 5k good faith check on a 1.9M house and he needs 40k to 60k sitting in escrow to be taken seriously by the seller's attorney. My money buys the option period. If he finds the buyer, I get paid out of the fee. If he doesn't, my money is somewhere between slow and gone depending on what the escrow terms say and how that state treats deposit release.
The second wants closing-table money. He'd rather take title for a few hours and sell to his end buyer the same day, which means he needs the full purchase price for that window. That's a bigger check, and there are transfer tax and recording consequences that differ a lot by state, but my exposure only exists once there's a real buyer with real money on the other side.
So one is a small check against real uncertainty, and the other is a large check against almost none, at least in theory. The first one has a lot more of these deals. The second one has maybe two a year.
I can't tell which risk is actually mispriced. Curious where the capital people in here sit, and where the operators think their money is best spent.
Which luxury wholesaling request would you rather fund?
24 votes