A mezzanine loss case study: what happens when a senior loan default forces a cure decision
Consider a mezzanine position, say $2.6M behind a roughly $8M senior loan on a 60 unit value add, structured at a low double digit current pay over a three year term with a pledge of the interests in the borrowing entity as security. Payments running for over a year before the renovation runs over budget and the senior loan fails an extension test is a realistic path for this kind of deal to unwind. The moment that failure happens is when the real mechanics of a mezz position get tested. An intercreditor agreement typically gives the mezz lender the right to cure a senior default, but curing means funding the senior's payments and paying down principal to satisfy a coverage test, often requiring new capital call multiples larger than the original mezz investment. If the mezz documents have no mechanism to force every investor in the syndicate to contribute, and only a fraction are willing to fund the cure, the cure fails. Without the cure, the standstill period runs out, the senior forecloses, and the equity pledge the mezz lender held becomes a pledge of interests in an entity that owns nothing. That is a full wipeout of principal, not a partial recovery, against whatever interest was collected during the performing months. The question worth asking before any mezz investment closes: what happens if a cure requires new money, and exactly how does that capital call get made and enforced across the syndicate. A pledge is only real protection if the group behind it can actually afford to use it when the moment comes.