The city says under 30 consecutive days. Does a 30 day minimum clear it?
I have a 2 bed 1 bath, 900 square feet, four blocks off a light rail line, under contract at 178k with 15% down. Furnishing budget 9,000. Unfurnished comps 1,400. Furnished 30 plus day listings in the same few blocks are asking 2,050 to 2,300.
The ordinance section I'm stuck on says a short term rental is any dwelling unit offered for occupancy for a period of fewer than thirty consecutive days, and that operating one requires a permit from a pool that has been capped for two years. So a 30 day minimum should sit outside the definition. Except the same code chapter has a separate registration requirement for "transient occupancy" that uses a different threshold, and the two sections don't cross reference each other.
My planning department email got a one line reply telling me to consult a professional, which I will, but I want to know what to ask.
The other half of this is the count itself. If a tenant checks in on the 3rd and out on the 2nd of the next month, is that 30 days or 29 nights, and does the ordinance count days or nights? A one day miscount is the difference between a lease and an unpermitted operation in a capped market.
The decision is whether I write my lease at a 31 day minimum and give up some flexibility, or 30 and rely on the code reading. Closing is in 19 days.