A 13 percent mortgage REIT yield is not the same as a 13 percent return
Business reserve cash sitting past what is needed for payroll gaps sometimes gets pointed at mortgage REITs, where screener yields commonly run 11 to 14 percent against a savings account paying a fraction of that. The basic mechanics: mortgage REITs own mortgages and mortgage backed securities rather than buildings, and they earn the spread between what it costs them to borrow and what the underlying mortgages pay. They are required to distribute most of their taxable income, which is where the large headline yield comes from. The trap is treating the distribution yield as the total return. A share price that declines meaningfully over several years while the dividend keeps paying means a holder has been banking income with one hand and handing most of it back in price with the other. Total return, price change plus dividends reinvested, is the only honest measure of what a holder actually keeps, and for many mortgage REITs over multi-year periods that number runs well below the headline yield, sometimes close to flat. For money that does not need to generate income right now and mainly needs to sit without erosion, a levered mortgage vehicle is a mismatch regardless of how attractive the yield looks on a screener. That kind of reserve is generally better matched to something closer to cash equivalents than to an instrument whose price can move meaningfully against the holder.