Does an mREIT count as my real estate holding or my bond holding
I've been sketching out how private capital gets allocated across buckets, and mortgage REITs broke my sheet. I had one line for real estate and one line for credit, and I couldn't decide which line to put them on.
The argument for real estate is straightforward. They're REITs, the assets are mortgages on property, and the demand for real estate credit is the reason the business exists at all. If banks pull back from lending on buildings, that shows up in what these companies can earn.
The argument for credit is that nobody in them owns a building. The income is interest, the risk drivers are interest rates and the spread between borrowing cost and asset yield, and the price moves with rates in a way an apartment REIT doesn't. Put an mREIT next to a bond fund and they respond to a lot of the same news.
Why it matters to me practically: if I count it as real estate, I'll size it small alongside actual property exposure and think I'm diversified when I'm holding two things that both depend on property values. If I count it as credit, I might end up with a supposedly conservative credit sleeve that has borrowed money behind it and trades with real equity-style drawdowns.
I can see a case for a third answer where it gets its own line and I stop pretending it fits. Curious which way people actually do it.
Where do mREITs sit in your allocation?
30 votes