A second lien bought for $9k gets wiped out when the first lien forecloses
A case worth studying, because it happens to people who understand structures far better than they understand liens. The note is a second mortgage, $31k balance, on a 1,400 square foot house in an older suburb. The seller's tape says the borrower stopped paying in 2023 and the property has equity. The buyer pays $9,000, which feels like nothing against $31k. What goes unchecked is the first. It carries a $132k balance and it is also in default, further along than the second. The buyer knows a first exists and assumes that "equity" on the tape means equity above both loans. Value comes in around $148k once a real opinion is obtained, so there is maybe $16k of theoretical room, and nobody verifies where the first stands in its own process. The first lienholder completes its sale about seven months after the purchase. Bidding goes to roughly $139k. The first lien plus its accrued interest, advances, and fees eats that. The junior lien attached to the property, the sale extinguishes it, and whatever thin surplus exists goes into a process the buyer is too slow and too uninformed to chase. The result is $9,000 plus about $1,400 on an attorney and a title report, and nothing back. What to do differently: pull a current title report and the first lienholder's case status before bidding, never after, and treat the senior loan's payoff plus its accrued fees as the number that has to clear before the junior position has anything. Whether surplus proceeds are claimable, by whom, and how long you have, varies by state, so that part needs a local attorney. The core mistake needs no attorney at all. The buyer bought a junior position and priced it like a first.