Does the office maturity wall actually hand buyers a better basis, or someone else's problem

Question

Something like $1.5 trillion of commercial mortgage debt comes due through the end of 2026, with a heavy share sitting on office, and office delinquency on securitized loans hit an all time high above 12 percent earlier this year. That pair of facts supports genuinely opposite conclusions depending on how it gets read, and it is worth laying out the positions. The case for buying into distress now: the seller in these situations is often not a willing seller but a borrower facing a maturity date. Discounted payoffs, deed in lieu situations, and lender-driven sales are producing prices per foot that do not exist in a normal market, and resetting basis low enough can make mediocre leasing pencil, while the buyer pool stays thin since most capital will not touch the word office right now. The case for waiting: a low basis on a building that cannot be leased is still a bad deal. The distress is concentrated in exactly the stock tenants have stopped wanting, older commodity space with deep floorplates and no amenity base. Re-leasing capital on buildings like that can run $80 to $120 per square foot all in, and against a $70 per square foot purchase price, real basis lands near $190, which the rents will not support. Waiting further into the cycle lets more of the unfixable buildings resolve into conversions or teardowns, clearing the remaining inventory. A third position worth considering: none of the above matters much, and the only office worth owning is the space that already leases, at whatever price that requires, with the discount hunt itself a distraction. A fourth: the only rational entry point is conversion basis, underwriting the building as residential or another use entirely and treating office income purely as bridge revenue until the conversion happens, an approach that lives or dies entirely on local code, which varies enormously by city and state. Worth hearing where people land and why.

sonia_alvarez · Answer

The discounts you are describing mostly are not reaching passive equity. When a loan goes bad the resolution runs through the special servicer, and the buyers who get first look are the ones who can close all cash in three weeks with no financing contingency and no partnership approval. By the time a deal is packaged into a syndication with a PPM and a 60 day raise, the price has been marked up and the sponsor's promote is sitting on top of it. I voted wait, mostly because the basis story tends to get told to LPs about deals that did not actually get bought at a distressed basis.

devon_pierce · Answer

@sonia_alvarez that is the sharpest objection in the thread and it has held in every distressed cycle on record. The discount goes to speed, and speed goes to balance sheet capital.

derekj19 · Answer

Voted only-buy-what-leases. Every leasing broker I talk to says the same thing in different words: tours are happening, but almost all of them are in a handful of buildings, and the rest of the inventory doesn't get shown at all. If a building isn't on the tour list, price doesn't fix that.

jordan_ellis2 · Answer

What I still can't work out is how you'd tell in advance whether a specific building is on that tour list or off it. Is there a proxy? Year built, floorplate size, walkability to lunch, ceiling height? @derekj19 what do the brokers actually say makes the difference?

dmitri_248 · Answer

The conversion option deserves more caution than it usually gets in these threads. Whether an office building can become apartments turns on the local building code and zoning, and in some cities on a specific adopted conversion ordinance, and those vary by municipality as well as by state. Egress requirements differ, as do window and light standards for habitable rooms and the change of use triggers under the adopted code. A building that pencils in one city is a non-starter across a county line. So if you vote conversion basis, the diligence item is the code analysis from an architect licensed in that jurisdiction, done before the offer, and anyone relying on a sponsor's one line assertion that "the city is supportive" is relying on nothing. That is genuinely a question for a licensed professional in the specific jurisdiction, and a forum cannot settle it.

mitchell_ray4 · Answer

What kills these conversions is the plumbing risers and the floorplate depth. Office cores put wet stacks in a couple of places because you only need restrooms. Apartments need a kitchen and a bath in every unit, so you're coring floors and running new stacks through occupied structure, and on a deep floorplate you end up with bedrooms nobody can legally call a bedroom because there's no window. I've priced work like that. It is not a discount project.

chriswalton8 · Answer

Voted buy now, and it is worth defending against @sonia_alvarez. The distress is a three year grind of extensions failing one at a time rather than a single auction. Plenty of it resolves as a negotiated sale between a borrower who wants out and a lender who will take a payoff below par, and those never go through a competitive process at all. A sponsor with a relationship and a real track record does get those calls. The question for an LP is whether the sponsor under review is that person or is buying at auction and describing it as off market.

luis_carrera · Answer

@chriswalton8 how would an LP verify that? "Off market" is on just about every deck in circulation.

gregpowell66 · Answer

@luis_carrera ask for the loan payoff figure and the date the seller's loan matured, then ask what the prior owner paid and when. If the sponsor bought at a number close to the outstanding loan balance and the loan was past due, the story checks. If the numbers do not tie, the answer usually turns into an explanation. The vote here is only buy what leases. Look at a 1980s office building through a construction lens and the systems are at end of life across the board. Rooftop units, elevators, envelope, electrical capacity that cannot carry modern density. A $70/sf price on a building that needs $60/sf of base building work before anyone talks about tenant space is a construction project with a rent roll attached, whatever the pitch calls it.

omar_haddad · Answer

@gregpowell66 yes, and the base building number is the one that grows. Tenant improvement scope is at least bounded by a space plan someone signs. Base building work is bounded by whatever the inspector finds when you open the ceiling, and on a 40 year old office that's asbestos in the mastic, a fire alarm panel nobody makes parts for anymore, and a chiller that fails its first summer under new management.

I split the difference on the vote and went with waiting. Not because I think the discount isn't real. I think the buildings that will still be worth owning in 2030 will still be for sale in 2027, and I'd rather buy one of those at a slightly worse price than buy the wrong one cheap.

Does the office maturity wall actually hand buyers a better basis, or someone else's problem

10 replies