The sponsor's TI number is a placeholder on a mezz piece I'd fund
A group I've looked at before sent me a mezzanine slot behind a senior loan on a five story office in a second tier downtown. Building is 1998, about 110,000 sf, 71 percent leased. Senior is around $9.4M, they want $1.8M behind it, and my piece would be $250k of that.
What I have: rent roll, senior term sheet, three years of operating statements, and a leasing budget.
What bothers me is the leasing budget. Tenant improvement allowance is shown as a flat $30/sf across every vacant suite, and the leasing commissions line is a single round number. Nothing distinguishes a suite that was built out two years ago from the 9,000 sf that has been dark since 2021 with the ceiling grid half down. When I asked, I got told $30 is what the market is doing. Maybe it is, but a flat number across dissimilar space reads like someone filled a cell to make the model balance.
The part I actually can't price: mezz sits behind $9.4M of senior debt on a building where the whole national story is that older commodity space keeps struggling. If leasing runs 18 months slow, the senior gets paid and I don't.
Decision in front of me is whether to ask for a re-cut leasing budget suite by suite before I go further, or just pass because a placeholder that size means the rest of the model has placeholders in it too. I don't know which is the right read yet.