Weighing two fee structures for taking over a 190-space paved lot
Consider a property manager asked to take over a 190-space paved lot near a hospital campus and courthouse, previously self-managed with a payment app and occasional weekend checks. From twelve months of statements: 118 monthly permits at $110, so $12,980 a month. Transient collections average $6,300 a month but range from $3,900 to $11,400 depending on the month. Gross runs about $231k a year. Expenses: taxes $46,800, insurance $7,200, snow removal $11,000, sweeping and light repair $4,400, app processing at 6.5% of collections, electric for lighting $1,900. NOI lands in the low 150s before any management fee. Say the two offers on the table are 4% of gross collections, or a flat $2,750 a month plus 20% of anything above a baseline set at last year's gross. The 4% option comes to $9,240 a year, which is thin compensation for handling dispute calls and tow coordination. The flat plus incentive structure is $33k plus upside, which looks better on its face, but the baseline it's built on deserves scrutiny before accepting it, since a baseline set on a season with unknown leakage locks in whatever inefficiency already exists. On the gates and plate reader question, roughly $95k installed: the transient side is almost always where leakage hides on a lot like this, not the permit side, but that's hard to prove from an app dashboard that only shows what people did pay rather than what should have been collected. The more disciplined approach is generally to negotiate the fee structure first, run at least one season with better data collection under the new management, and then make the capital decision on gates and readers once there's real evidence of where the revenue is actually leaking.