Where preferred equity should sit in a recap, at the property JV or the holdco

Question

In a recap where a sponsor offers a choice of where preferred equity sits, the decision usually comes down to two structures worth weighing against each other directly. Option one places the pref holder as a preferred member of the property-owning LLC itself, directly above common in that entity's waterfall. Option two places the pref at a holding company that owns 100% of the property LLC, with pref rights at that upper level and a pledge of the holdco's membership interest. Neither structure creates a lien on the real estate, so the comparison is not foreclosure versus non-foreclosure. What differs is reach and speed. At the property level, a pref holder sits inside the borrower, meaning the senior loan documents and single-purpose entity covenants apply directly: transfer restrictions, SPE requirements, all of it. That visibility to the senior lender comes with priority in the same waterfall as the cash. At the holdco level, the pref holder sits outside the borrower's SPE fence and structurally further from the property, but remedies can often be exercised without touching the mortgage borrower's ownership on paper, sometimes avoiding a change of control trip. A holdco pledge can also start to look like mezzanine debt in substance and get treated that way in a dispute, which turns on how a court in the relevant state characterizes the instrument. A sponsor may claim indifference between the two, but the senior lender rarely is. The property-level position generally suits an investor who wants priority inside the same waterfall as operating cash; the holdco position suits one who wants distance from the SPE covenants and is comfortable with the mezzanine-characterization risk.

chriswalton8 · Accepted Answer

The property JV level is generally the stronger position, and the reason is cash rather than remedies. Everything above the property LLC only receives what the property LLC distributes. Sitting at the holdco means priority is a claim on distributions that a manager has to declare and send upstairs. At the property level, a preferred return sits in the same waterfall as the operating cash, ahead of common, with the accounting done in the same set of books as the rent. In slow deals the fight is almost never about who has the better remedy on paper. It's about whether money leaves the property or gets absorbed in fees, reserves and affiliate payments before it ever reaches the entity holding the interest. On a change of control point, that assumption is worth testing rather than accepted outright. Plenty of senior loan documents define control at the ultimate beneficial ownership level, which means a shift up at the holdco can trip the same provision as one at the borrower. Counsel should read the transfer section of the actual loan agreement, not the term sheet summary, and note that enforcement of these provisions can vary by state and by lender, so the lender's written position is worth having before funding either way. The holdco structure earns its keep when multiple properties sit under one roof and cross-collateralized priority across all of them is the goal. For a single asset recap, it's hard to see what it buys that offsets the extra distance from the money. What does the senior loan's SPE language say about admitting new members? That may settle the decision on its own.

monica_tran3 · Answer

The point about affiliate payments is the one worth hammering. Cash gets eaten before it goes upstairs, every time, and always for a defensible-sounding reason.

Where preferred equity should sit in a recap, at the property JV or the holdco

2 replies