What sits between small claims and a litigation attorney when a survey shows a four foot encroachment before closing
Here is a scenario worth working through. A buyer is under contract on a lot with a March 14 closing, and a survey that cost 650 shows the previous owner's concrete pad sitting about four feet over the line onto what the buyer is purchasing. The seller does not dispute the survey numbers and also does not offer to do anything about them. The agent's instinct is to let it go, since the pad has been there since 2019 and nobody has complained. Someone else suggests small claims for maybe 2,000, which is the wrong tool, because money does not move the pad and it does not clear the record for the next buyer. The middle ground people miss is that the fix here is documentary. A recorded encroachment agreement or a written license signed by the seller before closing is the instrument that actually binds, and it can usually be drafted for a fixed fee nowhere near a litigation retainer at 300 to 400 an hour. A title company can also be asked, in writing, whether it will insure over the encroachment and on what terms. That written position is leverage, because it tells the seller exactly what a future buyer will run into. A mediator who handles real property can get a stalled conversation moving, though mediation produces an agreement that still has to be drafted and recorded before it has teeth. Anything enforceable ends up recorded, and in practice an attorney prepares it. Against 187,000 that cost is small, and a seller who wants to close on the 14th is at their most agreeable in exactly this window.