Who is actually the FinCEN reporting person on a cash close to an LLC

Question

On non-financed entity purchases, the residential real estate reporting rule assigns reporting obligations through a cascade, and in practice every party at the closing table tends to assume it is someone else's job. A closing attorney may be willing to take on the reporting role for a set fee per transfer, with an add on if there are more than a couple of beneficial owners to collect information from. A title agent may claim she is the default reporting person under her underwriter's read of the cascade and would rather designate the role away. Neither position gets put in writing until the other side moves first. Two things are worth being precise about before quoting a client on this. First, the cascade is not fixed: the rule allows the parties to reassign who serves as the reporting person by written agreement, provided the designation is documented properly. Second, the party who signs that designation generally takes on the associated record retention obligation along with the reporting duty itself, not just the paperwork of filing. The practical approach for anyone coordinating these files is to build the fee for handling the report into the engagement up front, since eating a few hundred dollars out of a modest coordination fee erodes the economics fast, while also making sure the written designation is actually signed rather than assumed, so the obligation does not default to whoever happens to be the cheapest body in the room.

Rena Expert · Accepted Answer

The mechanism is a cascade of persons involved in the closing, and the rule contemplates that parties in the cascade can shift the obligation to another person in the cascade by written designation agreement. So both people at your table are describing real features of the same rule. The one who signs the designation is the one who owes the report and the associated recordkeeping, which runs for years after the transfer, not just through closing. That's the part your title agent is trying to get out from under, and she's right to think about it as an ongoing file obligation rather than a one-time form.

Two things about your economics. $750 per transfer against a $1,200 coordination fee only looks bad if you assume you're absorbing it. Entity buyers paying cash for residential property are not usually fee-sensitive at that level, and 14 files a year is a line item you can quote separately with the attorney's engagement letter attached. What you cannot do is take the designation yourself as a non-attorney and then perform the analysis of whether a given transfer is even reportable, because deciding whether an exemption applies to a particular trust or financed structure is legal judgment, and in several states doing that for a fee lands you in unauthorized practice territory. That's for your state bar to answer, and FinCEN has nothing to say about it.

The other cost worth pricing here is data handling. Collecting beneficial ownership identifiers means you're holding government ID numbers on a shared drive with retention obligations attached. Ask your E&O carrier in writing whether compliance work and that data are inside your policy, because general transaction coordination endorsements often aren't written for it. And confirm the current cascade language and effective dates with the attorney rather than a summary, including mine.

nataliehsu · Answer

The designation-holder-owes-the-retention point is the part I'd never have guessed. So the cheap way to look helpful is also the expensive way to sign up for five years of file custody.

derekj19 · Answer

I sat in on a closing where the attorney handled this and it added about 20 minutes of front-end work, mostly chasing the ID copies for two members who live overseas. The report itself wasn't the hard part. Getting documents out of a buyer who has already wired the money and considers himself finished was the hard part. If you're quoting a fee, thatch, price the chasing.

mikeoconnell7 · Answer

A coordinator who tries to build a compliance add-on into the service menu runs into exactly this wall. The moment the deliverable is "we determined this transfer was exempt," the coordinator is making a legal determination without a license in most states. What a coordinator can sell is document collection and delivery into the attorney's system, which is a $150 task, and the $750 belongs to whoever signs the determination.

ryanmck27 · Answer

Does the reporting obligation land differently if the buyer is a trust rather than an LLC? My pre-license course spent about four sentences on FinCEN and none of them mentioned trusts.

tonyv88 · Answer

Halyard, certain trust transfers are inside the scope, which is exactly the determination lantern is saying he can't make. That is a call for the attorney on the file. Thatch, unrelated but relevant to your fee: a common pattern when an owner buys through a single member LLC is the insurance carrier reissuing the landlord policy at a higher premium once the named insured changes. That is not your obligation, and it still ends up as your phone call.

tylerbrooks9 · Answer

The simplest version this thread supports is to let the attorney hold the obligation and bill it through at cost plus something for the chasing, while keeping no ID numbers on your own drive. Anything more clever than that buys liability instead of margin.

Who is actually the FinCEN reporting person on a cash close to an LLC

7 replies