$640 for drone and boundary overlays, closed 19 days later
I ask the dumb questions here so I'll narrate this the same way. I had never sold visual media to anyone before this and I priced it by guessing.
The property was 68 acres of mixed pasture and timber in a market where the buyer pool is mostly people two hours away. It had been listed 210 days with four ground level photos taken from the driveway, which told a buyer nothing about the shape of the parcel or where the creek ran.
What I did: two hours of drone work across a morning and an afternoon so the light differed, then a set of eight stills with the parcel boundary drawn over them from the county GIS layer, plus one 90 second video that flew the road frontage, then the pasture, then the creek, then back up to show the neighbors' tree lines. I charged $640. Cost me a $19 airspace app subscription I already had, about nine hours total, and $0 in new gear because I'd bought the drone the year before for reasons that had nothing to do with real estate.
Went under contract 19 days after the new media went up. I'm not going to claim my photos sold it, the listing agent also dropped the price $12,000 the same week, so two things moved at once.
The part that nearly broke it was the boundary overlay. I traced the parcel lines from the GIS parcel viewer and they were off from the recorded survey by enough to matter on the north edge, maybe 40 feet, which on a creek boundary is a real dispute. The agent caught it. We ended up putting approximate, not a survey on every overlay image and referencing the recorded plat, and I'd have been in an ugly spot if a buyer had relied on my drawing. Whether that disclaimer is enough varies by state and it's a question for the agent's broker and a licensed surveyor, not for me.
What I'd keep: the two light windows, the boundary overlay as the actual product rather than a bonus, and the disclaimer language on every single frame.