Clause 14 forfeits everything after 30 days late
An operator I've been talking to sent me the template he uses for his owner-financed land sales so I could see how the deal works before I put money anywhere near it. I read documents for a living in the sense that I read the ones other people skip, and this one has me stuck at the top of page four.
Setup for anyone new to the term: a contract for deed, sometimes called a land contract or installment contract, is where the seller keeps legal title to the property and the buyer pays monthly. The buyer gets the deed only when the last payment clears. It's how a lot of rural land gets sold, because banks generally don't lend on raw ground, so the seller becomes the lender.
Clause 14 says if a payment is more than 30 days late the contract terminates, the buyer's interest ends, and every dollar paid to date is retained by the seller as liquidated damages. On a parcel where somebody has paid $3,000 down and 26 months at $410, that's about $13,600 gone.
The operator says that's standard and he's never had to use it. What I don't know is whether a clause like that is enforceable as written, or whether a court would treat a buyer with that much equity as having something closer to a mortgage that needs a real foreclosure.
So the decision on my desk is small but concrete. Do I ask him to change the clause, or do I ask him what his lawyer said about it and see whether he has an answer? I'd rather know what a good version of this clause looks like before I open my mouth.