Whether to take $2,000 or $6,000 down on a $22,000 rural parcel sold on terms
Run the same 20 acre parcel two ways and the two columns come out close enough that reasonable people land in different places, so here are the numbers. Cost in is $8,400. Ask $22,000 on terms over 9 years, at a rate that sits in a range rather than a fixed number, because it moves with what buyers in that market will actually accept. Low down option, $2,000 down. The phone rings a lot more, since the $1,500 to $2,500 band is where inquiries jump on most listings. A quarter of cost comes back at closing and the rest arrives $230 at a time. If the buyer walks in month 8 the seller has collected maybe $3,800 total and is re-marketing a parcel that already cost money to market once. High down option, $6,000 down. Fewer calls and longer time on market, with 71 percent of cost recovered on day one, and a buyer who saved $6,000 tends to behave differently from one who saved $2,000. Every default costs less. The honest tension is that the low down maximizes total interest collected and the size of the buyer pool, while the high down maximizes cash back on day one and probably payment reliability. Twenty closed contracts would settle it, and that data rarely gets published. If anyone here has default rates broken out by down payment band, post them. Worth arguing too whether a middle number like $3,500 just buys the worst of both.
On a $22,000 owner-financed rural parcel with $8,400 in cost, which down payment would you set?
20 votes