Cost per site to build and cost per site to buy keep landing in the same place
I've been pricing two paths to roughly the same 40 site outcome and I don't trust that they're converging.
Path one, buy. Small operating parks in the corridor I'm watching trade somewhere around 28k to 42k a site depending on utilities and season length. Call it 35k for something with working 50 amp and a bathhouse that isn't a liability.
Path two, build. I own 14 acres already, bought as a hold, gently sloped, road frontage, power at the line. Contractor ranges I've collected for full sites with water, sewer and 50 amp run 18k to 34k each, and the spread is entirely about whether I'm on septic and a well or tying into anything municipal. Add roads, a bathhouse, a shop, permitting, engineering, and the survey work, and my all in per site lands right around 34k. Which is suspiciously close to just buying one.
The difference is that the built park has zero revenue for two seasons and every dollar of the estimate is a range rather than a fact. The bought park has a rate card, a repeat guest list, and a well that has already either failed or not. I also know that septic design for a campground is not a residential septic design, and my ranges may be optimistic in ways I can't see yet.
On the other side, the bought park comes with 40 years of deferred everything, and I'd be paying somebody else's cap rate on income I could create at cost.
Where do people land when the two numbers meet?
When build cost per site and purchase price per site are roughly equal, which do you choose?
20 votes