Peak six weeks carry the whole rate card and the other 46 don't
Park is 58 sites in a mountain market, two hours from a metro, decent but not spectacular natural draw. Seller gave me two years of monthly revenue and it's the cleanest seasonal shape I've seen. July and August plus three holiday weekends are roughly 61 percent of annual site revenue. May, June, September do most of the rest. November through March is a rounding error and they don't even plow.
Here's my problem with underwriting it. The broker's pro forma takes the peak nightly rate, applies a modest occupancy lift, and lands on a number that's about 22 percent above trailing revenue. Every dollar of that lift comes from shoulder season nights that the market has never actually paid for. And when I model the shoulder honestly, at last year's rates and last year's occupancy, the deal goes from an 8 cap to something in the low sixes at the ask.
The counterargument I can't dismiss: the current owner does no marketing, has no online booking, and won't take reservations more than 60 days out. That's a real operational gap, and a park with a working booking system genuinely does pull more shoulder nights. So some of the lift is available to a better operator. I just can't tell you how much, and neither can the broker.
What do experienced people anchor to here? I keep flipping between two positions. One says pay for what the park earned and treat the upside as free. The other says if I only pay for trailing revenue I'll never buy anything in this sector, because every seller is a poor operator and every buyer knows it.
What do you anchor your offer to on a heavily seasonal park?
29 votes