Underwriting an RV park where six peak weeks carry the whole rate card
A seasonal RV park in a mountain market two hours from a metro is a useful case for how badly a broker's pro forma can diverge from trailing revenue. If two years of monthly data show peak summer weeks plus a few holiday weekends accounting for 60 percent or more of annual site revenue, with the shoulder months doing most of the rest and winter close to nothing, the shape of that revenue curve should drive the entire valuation exercise. A pro forma that takes the peak nightly rate, applies a modest occupancy lift, and arrives at a number 20-plus percent above trailing revenue is usually pulling that lift entirely from shoulder season nights the market has never actually paid for. Modeling the shoulder honestly, at last year's actual rates and occupancy, can move a deal from an 8 cap headline down into the low sixes at the asking price. The legitimate counterargument is operational. A park with no online booking system, no marketing, and a policy of not taking reservations more than 60 days out has a real, identifiable gap between current performance and what a competent operator could achieve, particularly in shoulder season nights that a booking system would capture. The discipline worth holding onto: pay for what the asset has actually earned on a trailing basis, and treat operational upside as something to underwrite separately and conservatively, not as a given baked into the purchase price. Every seller in this sector looks like a poor operator to the next buyer, which makes trailing revenue the only anchor that doesn't depend on someone else's assumptions.
What do you anchor your offer to on a heavily seasonal park?
29 votes