Timing the hours on a storage facility against a six unit, and passive doesn't hold up

Question

A useful way to compare a small facility and small multifamily is to have owners of each log a month and put the comparison side by side. A 118-unit facility, self-managed, comes in around 31 hours for the month. Roughly nine of those are rate management, going through the roll and deciding who gets an increase. About six are delinquency, notices and phone calls plus one auction prep. Five are lead response, since storage leads go stale in about four hours. The rest is vendor coordination, gate issues, and the occasional lock cut. A six-unit building comes in around 19 hours, with eleven of those tied to a single water heater. No leasing that month, no turnover, nobody late. A quiet month can run four hours, a bad month closer to forty. The pattern is that storage hours are steady and small and constant, while multifamily hours are lumpy and occasionally awful. Storage never really goes to zero because the pricing work is continuous. Every unit is on a month to month agreement, and every one of them is a decision made monthly. The defensive argument for storage is real, the demand comes from life events that do not care about the economy. But framing 31 steady hours a month as passive ownership only holds up once it is handed to third-party management, and at 118 units the fee stack can make that a hard number to justify. Whether storage or multifamily is the actually passive one depends heavily on whether the owner is self-managing or paying for management, more than on the asset type itself.

carlos_nunez · Answer

31 hours sounds low for self-managed at 118 units, and a log like that usually misses the interruptions. The hours aren't the real cost anyway. The cost is that storage hours can't be scheduled. A lead comes in Tuesday at 2pm and if it's answered Wednesday it's gone. A water heater can wait until lunch is finished.

tashaford30 · Answer

Quarry's point about scheduling is the one that would decide it for most people. Planning around a job means nine hours of rate work can happen Sunday morning, while five hours of lead response cannot, because the leads don't arrive on Sunday morning.

marcus_hale41 · Answer

The answer changes completely once management is involved, and that's where I'd focus. On the passive positions I hold, my hours go into reading reports and asking why a number moved, not into operations. That's maybe three hours a month per position, and the trade is the fee and the loss of control. At 118 units third-party economics are genuinely bad, which is why the truly passive version of storage tends to be either a much bigger asset or a position in someone else's, and both of those are different risks from the one Kestrel is comparing.

priya_n21 · Answer

This thread is answering the real question, which is whether either of these produces income without a second job. Sounds like neither, at that size.

luis_carrera · Answer

Marlow, that framing doesn't quite hold up. 31 hours a month is a bit under an hour a day. That's a hobby, not a job, and the work is sitting at a computer adjusting rates rather than driving somewhere with a wrench. The real question is whether the rate management can be automated down. Revenue management software exists for this, and if it takes nine hours to three, storage wins the comparison on hours and wins it on tenant risk too.

devon_pierce · Answer

Software cuts the hours and adds a judgment problem. Automated rate increases don't know that a market has two competitors half empty and undercutting on price. Somebody still has to look.

kevin_lombard · Answer

Basic question, why is there rate work every single month? With a rental the rent is the rent for a year. Is it that storage leases are month to month so you can change the price whenever, and so you kind of have to?

ehernandez74 · Answer

That is the mechanism. Month to month terms mean both sides can move, so street rates adjust with demand and existing tenants see periodic increases, which turns the revenue line into a series of small decisions instead of one annual one. It cuts both ways: repricing into a strong market can happen within weeks, something apartments cannot do, but a tenant can also leave in thirty days with no lease holding them. The number worth adding to a comparison like this is dollars per hour rather than hours alone. A handful of hours spent on rate work against a large gross revenue line is often the highest paid work an owner does in a given month.

Timing the hours on a storage facility against a six unit, and passive doesn't hold up

8 replies