Is it the 55-plus label people pay for, or the pool and the programming?
I've toured four age-restricted rental communities in the last month, which for someone who was selling insurance a year ago is a lot of clubhouses.
Two of them were amenity heavy. Saltwater pool, pickleball, a paid activities director putting out a monthly calendar, dog park with a wash station. Rents about 20 percent over the conventional apartments a mile away. Both were basically full and the manager at one told me she keeps a waitlist she never has to work.
The other two were plain. Age restriction, a small community room, a walking loop, no staff beyond maintenance and one leasing person. Rents maybe 6 or 7 percent over conventional. Also full, also older buildings, and one had residents who'd been there eleven years.
So which thing is actually producing the rent? If it's the amenities, then a new build has to spend the money up front and keep spending on staff to hold the premium. If it's just being 55-plus in a market where nobody else is, then the cheap version earns nearly as much per dollar spent and you're not running a social club.
I genuinely don't know which way to lean and everyone I ask answers with whatever they own. Voting below.
What is actually producing the rent premium in age-restricted rentals?
29 votes