When a short-term rental pro forma adds $1,300 a month gross and the owner nets $480
A useful case for anyone weighing a co-hosted short-term conversion against a long-term lease. Take a two bedroom condo rented long term for three years at $1,650, walkable to a hospital and a small downtown, with the tenant giving notice and a co-host managing a handful of units in the same zip code proposing a switch to nightly. The co-host's pro forma: $135 average nightly rate, 72 percent occupancy, roughly 22 nights a month, $2,950 gross. Management fee at 18 percent of gross runs $531. Cleaning at $95 a turn is billed to the guest and treated as a pass-through. Utilities and internet run about $250 once the owner is paying them instead of the tenant, supplies and consumables $90, HOA $310 either way, a city short-term rental permit $275 a year, and insurance roughly $60 a month higher under the short-term policy. Net that out and gross of $2,950 minus roughly $1,264 in costs lands near $1,686 a month, against a long-term net of about $1,205 after HOA, insurance and a maintenance reserve. That is a $480 a month improvement, before weighing $14,000 to furnish the unit and $1,200 for setup, which is about 32 months to recover before anything breaks. The number worth stress-testing before accepting a pro forma like this is the occupancy assumption. A 72 percent figure sourced from the co-host's own units in the same zip code is a reasonable starting point but not independently verifiable, and it is worth cross-checking against public short-term rental data for the specific submarket before committing. It is also worth reading every HOA amendment in full, not just confirming registration with the board, since a minimum lease term added later can undo the entire plan. Weighing $480 a month in improved cash flow against a nearly three-year payback period and an unverified occupancy number is a decision that deserves more than a pro forma from the party who benefits from a yes.