My sponsor on the Akron duplex said something offhand about STR analysis that I cannot get out of my head
He said the number that kills first-time STR buyers is not the occupancy estimate, it is the gap between occupied nights and paid nights after platform fees, cleaning reimbursements, and dynamic pricing adjustments. I had never separated those two things in my head before. I had just been looking at projected nights booked and multiplying by ADR like that was the whole picture. The Akron duplex is a long-term play so it doesn't apply directly, but I started going back through the numbers on my Cleveland condo thinking about what I would do if I ever flipped it to nightly rental, and the gap he was describing showed up fast. I was working off $165 a night at 62 percent occupancy on a two-bedroom in a mid-tier Ohio market, which gets you to roughly $37k gross on paper. But when I actually modeled the platform take at around 15 percent, cleaning fees that guests pay but that mostly offset cleaner costs rather than contributing to NOI, and a reserve line I've been told should run 8 to 10 percent of gross for an STR specifically because the wear cycle is so much faster, I was looking at something closer to $26k in actual cash before debt service. On a property I would have priced assuming $37k. That is not a small difference when you are sizing a loan. What I still don't know is whether operators are actually hitting that 62 percent in Cleveland right now or whether I pulled a number that made the deal feel better than it is.