What to do at renewal when a reliable tenant sits 190 under market
Here is the renewal math, using a case that comes up constantly. A three bedroom leases in that pocket at about 2,040 today. The sitting tenant is at 1,850, twenty-six months in, pays on the first every single month, and calls before small things become large ones. She replaced two toilet flappers herself and mentioned it afterward. Going to market is 190 a month, 2,280 a year. If she leaves, a realistic turn runs somewhere between 2,200 and 3,400 depending on paint and carpet, plus three to five weeks vacant, plus a leasing fee if anyone else does the showing. That is most of the first year's increase gone, and the replacement is an unknown. The counterargument from operators with more doors is that below-market rent compounds. Two more years flat and the gap is 300, and the increase eventually needed is one nobody accepts, so the turn happens anyway after paying for the delay. Resale matters here too, since a buyer underwrites the lease in place rather than the rent that could have been charged. The split-the-difference version is 1,950 with a note showing where market sits. That keeps the tenant in place and the owner closer to the curve, at a cost of about 90 a month against full market. Rent growth running near 1.3 percent nationally makes a 10 percent catch-up feel aggressive to a tenant reading the same headlines. What do people here actually do at renewal?
Renewal on a strong tenant sitting 190 under market. What do you send?
15 votes