When a called note cannot refi at today's rates, what is the lender actually holding if it extends
A scenario that is showing up more often. Say a private lender puts $210,000 at 7.2% on a 3/2 in Huntsville, Alabama, two years ago, and the note carries a call provision. The call letter goes out. The borrower tries to refi and the best he finds locally is 8.9% on a 25 year amortization, and at that payment the DSCR comes in at 1.04 against current rent of $1,580. No lender he talks to will go below 1.20. He is stuck, and so is the private lender. The house appraised at $248,000 in March, so there is equity, but equity does not fix a cash flow problem for a lender underwriting to coverage. The borrower asks for an 18 month extension at the same rate with no call provision. The note performs and he has never been late. The trouble is that the original thesis was a 24 month hold with repayment and redeployment, and the lender is already 26 months in, so the clock has slipped once. If rates come down enough for him to refi by month 44, fine. The harder exercise is pricing the scenario where they do not, and deciding what the lender is truly holding in that case. That is the question worth working through here.