Four doors in a town of 4,000 or two doors forty minutes from a job center
A useful comparison for this room: a fourplex in a small town, 4,000 people, one large employer, asking 185k, four units renting 575 to 650, gross around 29k. Against a duplex in a commuter town outside a mid-size metro, 310k, two units at 1,275, gross 30,600. On price per dollar of rent the small town wins easily. Cap rate on the fourplex numbers pencils near eight before the risk sets in, above the range this room usually discusses for small multifamily. The duplex sits closer to six and a half. What the small town has working against it is the single employer. If that plant slows, an owner faces four vacancies at once in a place with no second tenant pool, and a building bought at 185k stops being worth 185k. It is worth being precise about the usual argument that multiple units diversify vacancy risk, because that holds true across tenants and mostly fails across a single-employer town. Four doors on one street sharing one labor market is not four independent bets. The duplex carries a deeper tenant pool and worse cash flow, and every repair runs at the metro price. The honest answer is that the cap spread can be read as compensation for real risk or as a warning sign, and distinguishing the two requires knowing how concentrated that one employer really is.
Which would you rather buy?
27 votes