Underwriting a 96 bed purpose-built student housing deal where 40 percent of beds turn every August
Take a 96 bed purpose-built property, 24 four-bed units, half a mile from a flagship university with roughly 34,000 enrollment that has grown about 1.5% a year for a decade. A seller's T12 shows 96.5% occupancy and effective rent of $780 a bed, with a turn cost line of $310 a bed and concessions basically zero. Two things deserve scrutiny in a deal shaped like this. First, if the leases run August to July with a hard 12 month term and re-lease velocity in the offering memo shows 62% of returning tenants signing by the end of January, that implies about 40% of beds are being placed in a market that clears in a six week window, a real leasing risk that a stabilized T12 can mask. Second, if the guarantee forms are drafted as rent-only, no damages, and roughly a third carry no guarantor at all with a higher deposit instead, that meaningfully weakens the collections backstop. A realistic turn cost and concession assumption at this scale should run higher than what a seller's trailing twelve shows, since sellers often understate both heading into a sale. On the guarantee wording, a rent-only, no-damages structure with a third of leases unguaranteed should push the bad debt assumption up from whatever the seller's book shows, since student housing bad debt tends to concentrate in exactly the leases with weak guarantor coverage.