Deed into a land trust, straight into the LLC, or into your own name?
I've been reading titling patterns on sub-to acquisitions and I don't think the room agrees on this at all.
The land trust argument: the deed transfers to a trust, the seller is often named as beneficiary at first, and the recorded document looks less like a sale to a stranger. People say it draws less servicer attention. It also creates a clean place for a beneficial interest assignment later.
The LLC argument: the trust dance adds documents and a trustee and a second transfer step, and none of it changes the fact that the deed moved. If the lender looks, they see what happened either way. So put it where you actually want it for liability and bookkeeping and stop pretending the recording is camouflage.
The own-name argument: simplest, cheapest, and if you're going to ask the servicer to recognize you anyway, the extra entities are just friction on insurance and property tax.
What pushes me toward not overthinking it is that recording practice and what a county actually publishes vary by state, and about a dozen states don't make sale prices public at all, so the same structure hides different amounts of information depending on where the house is. What pushes me the other way is that the trust route seems to be what people who do volume use.
Anyone who has held more than one of these through a servicer transfer, which did you regret?
Where does the deed go on a sub-to acquisition?
29 votes