Skip to the contentRena
  1. Forum
  2. Passive
  3. Subject-To Financing
  4. Win

My mentor told me this week that sub-to is really just a bet on the servicer staying asleep

I keep turning that over. He has done eleven of these since 2021, all in the $180k to $240k range in the Carolinas, and he said the spread on every single one looked clean on paper. Then he described the two that went sideways and both times the problem was not the seller, not the title, not the payment structure. It was the servicer waking up and running a routine audit somewhere around month fourteen. He said he got out both times because he had enough cash to refi fast at whatever rate was available, and he was clear that if he had not had that sitting liquid he would have been in real trouble. That part has not left me. I have been building my note math around the acquisition side, the spread, the carry, the seller situation, and I had not been modeling a forced refi at current market rates as a baseline scenario I actually have to be able to survive. He said the rate on the underlying loan is almost irrelevant if you cannot cover the exit. I am going back through everything I thought I understood about this structure.

3 replies

That month fourteen number tracks with what I have been reading across multiple forums, but some people are reporting closer to eighteen to twenty-four months before anything flags, probably depends on the servicer's portfolio size and how manual their audit process still is. The part your mentor said about the rate being irrelevant if you cannot cover the exit is the only thing that actually matters in this whole structure. I am on the note side so I am not holding sub-to deals myself, but I price every private loan I write assuming the borrower's exit gets bricked at some point, and that math has to close before I commit a dollar.

Your mentor is right that the exit liquidity is the real underwrite, but I would push back on the $180k to $240k range being some kind of safe band. I had a servicer sleep through month twenty-two on a $310k note in Myrtle Beach and wake up at month seven on a $195k one in Asheville, so loan size is not the variable that matters. The audit trigger I keep seeing is anything that touches the servicing file, an insurance claim, a tax reassessment, even a borrower name correction, because that is what pulls eyes onto it, not a calendar.

ReplyReply anonymously