Which seller is actually easier, the one two payments behind or the one just moving?
I've had two sub-to conversations in six weeks and they were nothing alike, so I want to know which type people prefer to work with.
Seller A is behind. Two payments missed, a notice from the servicer, a 3.6% loan, essentially no equity left after arrears and fees. She wants out and she wants her credit intact. The deal solves a real problem for her, which makes it easy to agree on price, and the loan is the good kind. But I'd be bringing arrears money, the timeline is set by somebody else, and if she changes her mind midway I'm out whatever I spent.
Seller B is fine. Relocating in four months, 3.9% loan, about 40k of equity, no pressure at all. Nothing urgent, so nothing forces a decision, and he can walk to a regular listing any day. But there's no reinstatement to fund, no clock, and I could actually do diligence at a normal pace.
Everything I read says sub-to works particularly well with distressed sellers, which points at A. My gut as someone with a small portfolio and limited reserves points at B. I can see both.
Which sub-to seller would you rather work with?
13 votes