I hold back a third of my allocation for capital calls. Discipline or drag?
Got a capital call notice last spring on a 1970s vintage multifamily position, 11 percent of original equity, framed as funding an extended lease-up and topping up the interest reserve. I funded it. The alternative in the LPA was dilution on a formula I didn't love.
Since then I've kept about a third of my LP allocation in cash instead of placing it, on the theory that a called position I can't fund is worse than a position I never took. Two of my six positions have now called, one for 11 percent and one for 6 percent. So the reserve wasn't paranoia.
But the cost is real. That cash sat all year doing close to nothing while my placed capital was at least accruing pref. If I annualize the drag, I gave up something in the range of a couple points on the whole book to insure against calls that totaled less than 8 percent of deployed equity. I could have funded both calls out of distributions if I'd been willing to stop taking cash out for two quarters.
So which is it. Do you hold explicit dry powder against calls, or do you deploy fully and treat distributions plus your ordinary income as the reserve? A third view I've heard is that you avoid the question at the underwriting stage by only taking deals with fixed rate debt and a funded reserve at closing, and that if a deal calls capital you misread it going in. That last one sounds clean and I'm not sure it survives contact.
How do you cover LP capital calls?
30 votes