Sole remedy for an invalid sale is a refund without interest. That reprices the county.
Pulled the terms of sale for a county I've been buying in and read the paragraph everybody scrolls past. If the sale is later set aside, or the certificate is voided for a defect in the county's own process, the purchaser's sole remedy is a refund of the amount paid, no interest, no premium, no costs. Language like this is common in county sale terms, and what a court actually does with it depends on the state's statute, so anyone relying on it should have a lawyer in that state read it.
What interests me is the pricing consequence. Capital gets deployed, sits for some unknown number of months, comes back at zero. That isn't a credit loss, it's a duration loss with a zero coupon. If 2% of my certificates get voided and the average dead time is 16 months, my portfolio yield takes a real haircut that never shows up in anyone's weighted bid rate.
Counties differ enormously in how often this happens. Some are careful about notice and mailing and their sales stand. Some are understaffed and you can see the pattern in the number of certificates cancelled after the fact, which a good clerk will tell you if you ask.
So does procedural quality belong in the bid, or does it belong in a position limit? I've been treating it as a limit, no more than 8% of the book in any county I haven't watched for two seasons. Starting to think that's the lazy version.
How should county procedural quality enter a scaled lien program?
9 votes