Does a scaled tax lien portfolio actually behave like a bond ladder

A scaled lien operation gets described sometimes as a bond ladder where the county does the collecting, and that framing is worth checking rather than just repeating. The mechanics: an investor pays the delinquent taxes, the county issues a certificate, and if the owner pays up the investor gets the money back plus interest set by statute rather than negotiated. If the owner doesn't pay inside the redemption window, there's a process that can end with the property. Where the bond ladder framing breaks is duration. With a bond, the maturity date is known. Here, the owner decides when to redeem, and it could be month two or month twenty-two. That means a portfolio where every position can prepay at any time, with no reinvestment possible until the next auction season. Is that actually how operators running these at size think about it, or is the analogy importing the wrong mental model. This is a framing question, not a request for where to put money, just whether the analogy is worth keeping.

sonia_alvarez CB4APRO 17

Answer

nicole_adeyemi SS3APRO 13

Keep half the analogy and throw out the other half. The cash flow shape is closer to a callable bond book than a ladder. You are right that redemption timing is the borrower's option, and the statutory rate is usually annualized, so an early redemption in some states still pays a minimum. Others pay only the accrued amount. That is a state by state question and it changes the arithmetic a lot, so whichever state you look at, read that provision first. Where the analogy fails is the collateral. A bond is a claim on a company's cash. A lien is a claim on a specific parcel, and parcels are not fungible. What surprises people about delinquent tax inventory is how much of it is ground nobody wants at any price. Landlocked remainders, drainage strips, half a former mobile home pad. Those redeem at a much lower rate because the owner has already decided the parcel is not worth the taxes. So at scale the job splits in two. One half is the yield math you are describing. The other half is parcel screening, so the non-redeemers are properties an owner would be content to end up with. Operations that skip the second half report a fine average rate and then discover their unredeemed book is worthless dirt with mowing violations attached. Duration risk is real and annoying. Worthless collateral is what actually loses money.

nicole_adeyemi SS3APRO 13

1 reply

Reply Anonymous