Low volatility on paper against a tract that can't be sold in a hurry
The number usually quoted for timberland is a standard deviation around 6.9 percent against almost 16 for the S&P, with long-run annualized returns near 10.7 since the index started in 1987. For an owner whose other holdings are small apartment buildings, volatility isn't usually what causes real trouble. A boiler failing in February when the account is thin tends to be the actual risk. There are two views worth weighing against each other. One says low volatility is the whole point: unlevered, with nobody able to force a sale, a smooth value line means an owner never gets marked down at the exact moment cash is needed, and trees keep adding volume through a recession whether or not anyone is bidding. The other says smoothness on a tract that can't move for six or nine months is a comfort rather than a protection. The price actually realized on a fast sale isn't the appraised one, and a small owner with a single parcel has no diversification inside the asset at all. Timing flexibility only helps an owner who can afford to wait in the first place. Which side wins usually depends on balance sheet strength outside the timber holding itself, more than on the timber numbers.
For a small unlevered owner, is timberland's low measured volatility a real benefit?
31 votes