Is an $8,000 wholesale fee on a $150,000 rental a normal cost, or a red flag
Say someone gets approached by a wholesaler offering a house he says he has under contract, $150,000 purchase, a claimed $1,450 rent, and an $8,000 fee for the acquisition service, putting the total closer to $158,000 before closing costs. Wholesale fees on deals like this vary widely and can be entirely legitimate, but a few details here are worth treating as real flags rather than rudeness. A fee that size relative to price is not automatically wrong, wholesalers sometimes earn several thousand dollars for genuinely sourcing an off market property below its value, but the fee only makes sense if the underlying price is actually a discount. A rent estimate from the wholesaler that runs meaningfully above an independent estimate is worth taking seriously, a gap of over $100 a month on a modest rental is a large percentage difference and changes the return math directly. Declining to say what the property is actually under contract for is a legitimate question to ask and a seller or wholesaler who will not answer it is worth being cautious with, since it usually means the assignment fee is being hidden inside the number rather than disclosed separately. The reasonable path here is independent verification before any deposit moves: an independent comparable rent analysis, a licensed inspection, and title or public records confirming there actually is a contract at a specific price. A refundable deposit is lower risk than a non-refundable one, but refundable only means something if the terms for getting it back are in writing and clear.