On a wrap, a wider spread with 3 percent down or a thinner spread with 15 percent down
Take a wrap on a small three unit and lay out two versions of the same deal. Version A: sale at 340k, 10k down, wrap balance 330k at 8 percent. Underlying is 218k at 4.125. Monthly spread runs about 690. Version B: sale at 325k, 49k down, wrap balance 276k at 6.75. Same underlying. Monthly spread runs about 385. A pays roughly 3,700 more a year. B hands over 39k more at closing and puts a buyer with real skin in the deal on the other end, which matters for whoever is still writing the underlying check if payments stop. There is a second layer worth naming. Version A's buyer has almost no equity, so if values move down five percent they are underwater on a note someone else holds, and the incentive to keep paying gets thin. Version B's buyer would have to walk away from 49k, about as strong a default protection as exists without a lawyer involved. And a third layer: the bigger down payment reduces the wrapped balance, which reduces the balance the spread is earned on, so safety effectively gets bought with yield. On a 30 year note held to a five year balloon, A runs maybe 18k more in cumulative spread and B runs 39k more up front, which arguably says B wins on cash timing alone. Then again, B's cash lands now and A's is contingent for sixty months. Which structure would the room write?
On a wrap you're carrying, which structure do you write?
26 votes